<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s &#8220;Nuch&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com/2009/07/29/wheres-nuch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com/2009/07/29/wheres-nuch/</link>
	<description>Resources and Information for the Medical Marijuana Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com/2009/07/29/wheres-nuch/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com/?p=343#comment-709</guid>
		<description>Trutanich&#039;s Chief Deputy and staunch campaigner Jane Usher told our monthly meeting of Neighborhood Councils last month, that their office has determined that under California law ALL marijuana shops are illegal because unless the pot is grown and sold by members of a collective NOT for profit or commerce, they&#039;re in violation.  This comes despite the February decision by the Obama administration to discontinue prosecuting shops which comply with California law, which will take precedence from now on.  Sounds like everyone got &quot;Laura Chick-ed&quot; on this to get our endorsement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trutanich&#8217;s Chief Deputy and staunch campaigner Jane Usher told our monthly meeting of Neighborhood Councils last month, that their office has determined that under California law ALL marijuana shops are illegal because unless the pot is grown and sold by members of a collective NOT for profit or commerce, they&#8217;re in violation.  This comes despite the February decision by the Obama administration to discontinue prosecuting shops which comply with California law, which will take precedence from now on.  Sounds like everyone got &#8220;Laura Chick-ed&#8221; on this to get our endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

