<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>About Medical Marijuana &#187; cheryl aichel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com/tag/cheryl-aichel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com</link>
	<description>Resources and Information for the Medical Marijuana Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 02:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>LA doesn&#8217;t need buffer zones</title>
		<link>http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com/2010/01/14/la-doesnt-need-buffer-zones/</link>
		<comments>http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com/2010/01/14/la-doesnt-need-buffer-zones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheryl aichel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sucker's choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, the Los Angeles City Council debated how far medical cannabis collectives must be located from sensitive and residential uses. The Council failed to reach a consensous on buffer zones around a laudry list of sensitives uses, including schools, public parks, public libraries, religious institutions, licensed child care facilities, youth centers, substance abuse rehabilitation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, the Los Angeles City Council debated how far medical cannabis collectives must be located from sensitive and residential uses. The Council failed to reach a consensous on buffer zones around a laudry list of sensitives uses, including schools, public parks, public libraries, religious institutions, licensed child care facilities, youth centers, substance abuse rehabilitation centers, and other medical cannabis collectives. They will choose between a 500 or 1,000-foot buffer zone next Tuesday &#8211; a situation medical cannabis patient and advocate Cheryl Aichel described as a &#8220;sucker&#8217;s choice&#8221; during the public comments portionof the City Council meeting.</p>
<p><span id="more-574"></span></p>
<p>The City Council rejected plans to include residential uses as sensitive uses, and opted instead to prevent patients collectives from being located “on a lot abutting, across the street or alley from, or having a common corner with” any residential use, including mixed use properties. If approved with the final draft of the ordiance next week, this provision may displace hundreds of collectives, many of whom have never been problematic in their neighborhoods.</p>
<p>In written comments to the City Council, I said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Well-regulated medical cannabis collectives are good and inconspicuous neighbors, and there is no need that these facilities be separated from sensitive or residential uses. Los Angeles Chief of Police Charlie Beck told the Planning and Land Use Management (PLUM) Committee last year that an increase in crime was not typically associated with these facilities. Security requirements, hours of operation, and other measures in the draft ordinance are sufficient to protect public safety. If buffer zones are needed, however, they should be at least more lenient than the location regulations required of the city’s adult-oriented businesses, which according to Los Angeles Municipal Code 12.70(c), must be located more than 500 feet from schools, churches, and parks.</p>
<p>Requiring collectives to be located at least one thousand feet from residential uses is not just unnecessary – it is unworkable. Residential and commercial uses exist in close proximity in most of our neighborhoods. A one-thousand foot buffer zone from residential uses will eliminate virtually all suitable properties, as seen on maps prepared by the Planning Department. References to a “vacant residential lot” and “lot improved with a residential building or mixed use building containing residential units” should be removed from Section 45.19.6.3(A)(2). A more reasonable approach would be to allow collectives in any commercial or industrial zone, without regard to residential uses.&#8221;</p>
<p>The City Council may vote to adopt the final ordiannce as soon as Tuesday, January19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aboutmedicalmarijuana.com/2010/01/14/la-doesnt-need-buffer-zones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
