The City of Goleta in Santa Barbara County adopted a ban on medical cannabis collectives on Wednesday, but asked staff to come back with recommendations for regulations before September. The City Council opted for a ban on collectives because city staff indicated they did not have time to prepare a permanent ordinance before the city’s two-year old moratorium expires on August 30. State law prohibits local government from renewing a moratorium on any business for longer than two years.
Patients at Wednesday night’s meeting complained that the staff report supporting the ban was one sided – focusing only on law enforcement claims that collective attract crime. City staff presented reports from police officers from San Diego and San Bernardino Counties, but did not include research by Americans for Safe Access (ASA) showing that regulations reduce crime and complaints.
The City Council heard emotional testimony from local patients and providers, who vowed to keep fighting for regulations in the city. There is no word on what the city intends to do with the two collectives that survived a federal crackdown on property owners renting to collectives last year.
KCET’s SoCal Connected broadcast a story about the proliferation of medical cannabis collectives in Los Angeles tonight. The report was very critical of the City Council and City Attorney for failing to enforce the Interim Control Ordinance establishing a moratorium on new collectives in the city and for not moving fast enough to adopt a permanent ordinance.
This report is the latest evidence of growing frustration in Los Angeles neighborhoods. The Mid-Wilshire Neighborhood Council adopted a resolution this week asking the City Council to enforce the moratorium. They join the Melrose-Fairfax Neighborhood Watch, Eagle Rock Neighborhood Council, and others community groups in speaking up about medical cannabis. Many of the principals in those organizations were featured in the report.
Bad media is bad news for patients and providers in Los Angeles. Councilmembers must adopt a permanent ordinance before the moratorium expires on September 14, and we do not want them having that debate in the context of a public outcry. This report spared collectives and cooperatives the harshest criticisms – making only passing reference to marketing aimed at young people and profiteering. We can expect more critical coverage if the public outcry grows.
The City of Sacramento is the latest in California to see a proliferation of new storefronts maintained by legal medical cannabis collectives and cooperatives. More than twenty are reportedly operating there now – most of which opened within the last six months. The expansion of safe access is good news for patients suffering from HIV/AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, and other serious conditions. But advocates and elected officials there worry that the rapid expansion in safe access may lead to public ambivalence, possibly even a backlash, in a city where medical cannabis collectives have thus far operated without much controversy.
I sent an email to the Sacramento Mayor and City Council Members in April urging them to move quickly in adopting sensible regulations for collectives and cooperatives. Americans for Safe Access (ASA) Sacramento Coordinator Lanette Davies and other advocates have been talking with their representatives about sensible regulations, and the city’s Law and Legislation Commission is now considering language for an ordinance that will enact a temporary moratorium on new medical cannabis storefronts. Adoption of this ordinance is likely immanent. This will give the city an opportunity to write permanent regulations to regulate storefront collectives and cooperatives.
In my email, I explain that ASA research shows the benefits of local regulation:
“Some reports have suggested that storefront patients’ associations are magnets for criminal activity or other behavior that is a problem for the community, but the experience of those cities with regulations says otherwise. Crime statistics and the accounts of local officials surveyed by Americans for Safe Access indicate that crime is actually reduced by the presence of a collective; and complaints from citizens and surrounding businesses are either negligible or are significantly reduced with the implementation of local regulations. In Oakland, where collectives have been licensed since 2004, City Administrator Barbara Killey, notes that ‘The areas around the dispensaries may be some of the safest areas of Oakland now because of the level of security, surveillance, etc…since the ordinance passed.’”
The City of Sacramento is wise to pursue regulation, and local advocates will keep working with their elected officials to be sure the city’s final ordinance is one that facilitates safe access while protecting patients and the community at large. Advocates, including the city’s new collective operators, who wish to participate in this process can attend monthly ASA meetings on the first and third Tuesday of every month at 7:00 p.m. at Crusaders Hall located at 320 Harris Avenue, Suite H, in Sacramento. Email cannacare@earthlink.net for more information.
This Senate Joint Resolution urges the federal government to end medical marijuana raids in California and to create a comprehensive federal medical marijuana policy that ensures safe and legal access for any patient that would benefit from it. […]
The US Senate passed S.258, the "Saving Kids from Dangerous Drugs Act of 2010." Without amendments, this act and infringes on the rights of medical marijuana patients by doubling federal penalties and heightens the risk of arrest and prosecution for edible cannabis users. […]
The City of Sacramento is the latest in California to see a proliferation of new storefronts maintained by legal medical cannabis collectives and cooperatives. More than twenty are reportedly operating there now – most of which opened within the last six months. The expansion of safe access is good news for patients suffering from HIV/AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, and other serious conditions. But advocates and elected officials there worry that the rapid expansion in safe access may lead to public ambivalence, possibly even a backlash, in a city where medical cannabis collectives have thus far operated without much controversy.
