Cease and desist (San Diego)

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010
lake

Jeffery Lake

John R. Lamb writing in San Diego Citybeat -

“’It is coming, and it’s going to come hard!’ Jeffrey Lake is preaching to the choir this day, but the lanky, buttoned-down Downtown attorney sounds uncertain that his message is getting through. San Diego city leaders intend to pick off medical-cannabis collectives one by one, he intones, and without a unified effort to fight back, the battle will be even more uphill…”

Read the entire story online.

San Diego police cooperate with DEA

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

The San Diego Police Department cooperated with a multi-agency task force, including the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), to raid at least six medical cannabis collectives in the San Diego area today. Today’s action puts new urgency behind the calls for clarity on the Administration’s policy, and underscores the danger of local cooperation with federal law enforcement. It may be difficult for medical cannabis patients and advocates to maintain faith in comments made by the President and US Attorney General Eric Holder if DEA raids continue in California and other medical cannabis states. San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis has been a vocal opponent of safe access and repeatedly cooperated with the DEA  in 2007-2008 to close approximately twenty facilities. Her cooperation is almost certainly a factor in today’s raids.

You can see video of the raid online, including the police department shoving a handcuffed and wheelchair-bound man into a squad car.

Details are still coming in, but the San Diego chapter of Americans for Safe Access (ASA) reports raids at the following patients’ associations: SDDC, Top Quality, Natures RX, SDDS San Marcos, Answerdam, Movment in Action, Healing Dragon, Green Kross, PB Collective, Hillcrest Compassion, Medicinal Solutions  , Green Tree Solutions, Total Herbal Care, and Kush Lounge.

Where’s “Nuch”?

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

The City of Los Angeles continued its long march towards regulations for medical cannabis collectives and cooperatives today, when the Planning and Land Use Management (PLUM) Committee heard the second round of status updates from city departments. Committee members heard updates from the Planning Department, the Building and Safety Department, and comments from the public – including representatives from three Neighborhood Councils concerned about continued proliferation and nuisance activity around cannabis facilities. Notably absent, however, was input from newly elected City Attorney Carmen “Nuch” Trutanich, who has yet to take a public stand on medical cannabis regulations.

LA City Attorney Caren "Nuch" Trutanich

LA City Attorney Carmen "Nuch" Trutanich

City staff reported some progress during the brief discussion. Staff has mapped “sensitive uses” for 35% of the city. When the entire city is mapped, Planning Department staff will draw radii of various sizes around these addresses to determine how far collectives and cooperatives must be from a laundry list of uses, which may include schools, churches, parks, beach access points, youth-oriented businesses, places where young people tend to congregate, public beach access points, drug treatment facilities, and on and on.

Debate about what constitutes a sensitive use and how far permitted collectives must be from each is likely to be one of the most contentious debates in the process of writing the new ordinance. Neighbors concerned about crime and unchecked expansion in the number of patients’ associations are calling for broad buffer zones from a wide range of uses. Councilmember Paul Koretz, who is temporarily serving on the committee in former Councilmember Jack Weiss’ seat, expressed concern that the buffer zones must not be so large as to make operating a collective impossible. Chairman Ed Reyes assured listeners that the goal was to have an enforceable ordinance that secured access for those in need.

Buffer zones will be one of the contentious issues in the new draft ordinance, but there is an even more serious issue that threatens to complicate the process late in the game. City Attorney Trutanich has yet to weigh in on an unpublished draft ordinance circulated by city staff last week. Advocates worry that the City Attorney may be influenced by staff held over from former City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo, who regarded all storefront collectives and sales of cannabis as illegal. If Trurtanich ignores City Council instructions and case law affirming the legal status of collectives, he may revert to Delgadillo’s position that “illegal” activity can not be regulated. This would be a serious set back for patients and advocates.

Representatives from Americans for Safe Access (ASA) and the Greater Los Angeles Collectives Alliance (GLACA) are working hard to educate the City Attorney and his staff about the California Attorney General’s guidelines for medical cannabis, which recognize that legally organized and operated collectives may maintain storefront facilities; and about important case law upholding the legal status of patients’ associations in Los Angeles. Recent ASA court victories in Butte County and San Diego are the cornerstone of this effort.

Trutanich may pleasantly surprise advocates, who rallied around his candidacy in hopes of defeating former City Councilmember and medical cannabis opponent Jack Weiss in this year’s runoff election. However, his silence does little to reassure the community at this strategic juncture. Unless Trutanich repudiates his predecessor’s ideological stance and vocally supports real implementation, advocates may soon conclude that “better than Jack Weiss” is too low a standard for the City Attorney.

No one will benefit if the debate about new regulations regresses to where it was a year ago, when law enforcement and a reluctant City Attorney impeded regulation based on personal bias and faulty legal analysis. It is past time to move forward with sensible regulations, which are proven to protect patients and the community by reducing crime and complaints around collectives. The City Council should be eager for Los Angeles to join dozens of other jurisdictions that have already realized these benefits – especially given a growing backlash from neighborhood groups and critical media.